Nightrain
Senior Registered
Recently, I had an opportunity to view the two-and-a-half hour video entitled, "What the Bleep Do We Know: Down the Rabbit Hole", which had a basic plot, which enabled the producer to introduce some of the most current scientific theories and experiments. I had previously viewed short excerpts of the video, which had quite a bit of interesting "scientific" material. Upon viewing the video in its entirety I realized that the overall plot and accompanying information was built around the day-to-day observations of a 30-ish photographer, played by the wonderful actress, Marlee Matlin. She provided a great vehicle in which to present otherwise dry and difficult concepts.
Apparently, she was very dissatisfied with her life after a bad marriage, which resulted in very poor self-esteem. A turning point in her view of herself involved the issue of self-affirmation, which was supported by actual experiments by Masaru Emoto in 1998 involving drops of frozen water from all over the world, which were each subjected to various emotional treatments before being frozen and photographed. Supposedly, the water droplets that were given positive verbal treatment exhibited pleasing geometric structures. The water droplets that were verbally abused showed no such form. As a result of these experiments, our heroine remembered what someone had said to her about our bodies being composed of 95% water. So, her life suddenly improved as she began to give herself "good thoughts". Hooraayyy!
Now, the deductions of these experiments may well be true; and my own intuition is to believe in the possibility on a "gut" or spiritual level. However, the film portrays these experiments as main-line science; when, in fact, these results have not been duplicated. And, as one will find out here, Mr. Emoto's intentions are to sell his water, which may greatly bring into question his motives and objectivity.
I would ask anyone to give their opinion and experiences regarding this story; and how ready people seem to be to accept some internet and media claims without further investigation. What would you call "adequate" sources in support of scientific and paranormal claims?
Apparently, she was very dissatisfied with her life after a bad marriage, which resulted in very poor self-esteem. A turning point in her view of herself involved the issue of self-affirmation, which was supported by actual experiments by Masaru Emoto in 1998 involving drops of frozen water from all over the world, which were each subjected to various emotional treatments before being frozen and photographed. Supposedly, the water droplets that were given positive verbal treatment exhibited pleasing geometric structures. The water droplets that were verbally abused showed no such form. As a result of these experiments, our heroine remembered what someone had said to her about our bodies being composed of 95% water. So, her life suddenly improved as she began to give herself "good thoughts". Hooraayyy!
Now, the deductions of these experiments may well be true; and my own intuition is to believe in the possibility on a "gut" or spiritual level. However, the film portrays these experiments as main-line science; when, in fact, these results have not been duplicated. And, as one will find out here, Mr. Emoto's intentions are to sell his water, which may greatly bring into question his motives and objectivity.
I would ask anyone to give their opinion and experiences regarding this story; and how ready people seem to be to accept some internet and media claims without further investigation. What would you call "adequate" sources in support of scientific and paranormal claims?