• Thank you to Carol and Steve Bowman, the forum owners, for our new upgrade!

Very Discouraged

Misty8723

Senior Registered
I tried the hemi-sync tape and pretty much got nothing.

Vague thoughts and images that came through (and that I remember) were:

Bare feet with long toes
riding a horse
mountains, stream
a language that sounded vaguely French
the name Jeswyk
North Dakota
1725

The last three were in response to direct questions asking for a name, a location, and a year.

I'm wondering if I should keep trying, or just give it all up :(
 
I'm a little curious, what is it that you are expecting from these regressions that you feel very discouraged? Is it that you are not receiving enough information about the past life, or are you looking to recall an exotic (for want of a better word) past life experience?


The name, place and year data is v.g. info. Don't be discouraged. Next time you do one of these ask for a full birth date and a date of death if you can, and what it is you learnt from that life. ... and make a note of the time of any regression (astrologically it can provide some important information, esp. if you are given birth and death data).
 
Misty8723 said:
I tried the hemi-sync tape and pretty much got nothing.
Vague thoughts and images that came through (and that I remember) were:


Bare feet with long toes


riding a horse


mountains, stream


a language that sounded vaguely French


the name Jeswyk


North Dakota


1725
I would not call all of this "nothing". What were you expecting? Was this your first regression? If so, then this was a very good start. The more you do, the more information will come. You may now start having dreams or random thoughts that relate to what you have seen in the regression. Not everyone sees images in a regression. Sometimes you just get thoughts, sounds, names, etc. I would say this was very good. Start a journal and write it down.
 
I just want to see something and not just darkness all around. When they say "take some time to look around the scene" I see nothing but darkness. If I get vague images it just seems like something my mind is making up and is there and gone so fast I can't even process it. Or disappears in a poof when I realize I'm thinking something. Even the stuff that comes as a direct response to an asked question doesn't seem right. For instance, I've tried the most recent past life one a couple times. In response to the "what is your name" question, I've gotten a different one each time. So what is true? And sometimes when I realize I should be seeing something but I'm not, I feel like I'm trying too hard to come up with something.


I definitely don't care about exotic, just truth. It might be nice to get answers to some nagging lifelong issues / questions too. You always hear how a past life regression can cure you of things that are a hold over from a previous life. I kind of feel like I can't relax enough or get deep enough to get anything. It's so frustrating to have them tell you to relax the top of your head - well, how do you do that? Or go down the stairs to the door when I can't visualize any stairs or doors. The harder I try to imagine these things, the less likely I am to get anywhere.


Sorry, just ranting. It may just not be something I can experience and I need to accept that.
 
Don't worry about the most recent past life. Many people will block that out if the death was traumatic. Also don't worry about seeing "black". Some people don't see images. Just accept whatever and however information comes to you. Write it down and you can start researching later.
 
I never ask for a specific life - I just go where it takes me. I'm going to look up your info on "Ancestry", and see if anything comes up. I think you got a lot! Like firebird, and argonne said, it may come together later.
 
argonne1918 said:
I would not call all of this "nothing". What were you expecting? Was this your first regression? If so, then this was a very good start. The more you do, the more information will come. You may now start having dreams or random thoughts that relate to what you have seen in the regression. Not everyone sees images in a regression. Sometimes you just get thoughts, sounds, names, etc. I would say this was very good. Start a journal and write it down.
No, it wasn't my first, I've tried several. And I've even had a session with a hypnotherapist. I get thoughts, sometimes even images, but if anything it gets more difficult instead of easier. Nothing much comes to me randomly, or if it does I don't trust it :laugh:


Maybe I just try too hard to "see" things.
 
argonne1918 said:
Don't worry about the most recent past life. Many people will block that out if the death was traumatic. Also don't worry about seeing "black". Some people don't see images. Just accept whatever and however information comes to you. Write it down and you can start researching later.
The regression audio I tried was specific to last life. I have a very serious interest in my last life because I remembered it as a child, and even (according to what my mother told my sister) found the house I lived in. But she (my sister) doesn't remember which house. I thought maybe that PLR audio would help me remember, and I did get answers that came to the questions. But when I tried it again, I came up with a totally different name, and then I actually got bored in the middle of it and ended it.


The PLR I had with the hypnotherapist came up with similar life details, same name, but a different death. Which leads me to believe that at least some of it was just me making it up (one or the other, or both).


I have been writing everything down. I need to transcribe that session with the hypnotherapist I guess.
 
What I was up against on Ancestry.com is that we don't have enough information. I'm sure there were people in what is now North Dakota in 1725. In a PL regression, the mind puts a modern country designation on an area for recognition purposes. Helen Wambach remarked on this, so that was normal, Misty. I found people in Canada with names somewhat similar to Jeswyck. I looked at Canada because you mentioned hearing French. Is the name spelled right? Did you get any sense of your gender? Relax, and try again. Next time, just go where the regression takes you. It's there, Misty. For some reason, the information is hard to access.
 
BriarRose said:
What I was up against on Ancestry.com is that we don't have enough information. I'm sure there were people in what is now North Dakota in 1725. In a PL regression, the mind puts a modern country designation on an area for recognition purposes. Helen Wambach remarked on this, so that was normal, Misty. I found people in Canada with names somewhat similar to Jeswyck. I looked at Canada because you mentioned hearing French. Is the name spelled right? Did you get any sense of your gender? Relax, and try again. Next time, just go where the regression takes you. It's there, Misty. For some reason, the information is hard to access.
Thank you for looking BriarRose. I did google North Dakota and I think I understand that there were French there in the 1700s, but maybe not that early. I don't know for sure that the language was French. It wasn't something I intuitively understood the meaning of, and once I realized I was hearing it, it poofed away like everything else. It just sounded like it could be French. I got a sense of Jezwyk, but not sure about spelling, that may just be phonetic. Maybe Cheswyk would make more sense? I don't even know if it was supposed to be first or last name.


I'm sure I'll try again, I was just hoping for a little bit "more." I'm not even sure what "more" would be :laugh:
 
Misty8723 said:
I just want to see something and not just darkness all around. When they say "take some time to look around the scene" I see nothing but darkness. If I get vague images it just seems like something my mind is making up and is there and gone so fast I can't even process it. Or disappears in a poof when I realize I'm thinking something. Even the stuff that comes as a direct response to an asked question doesn't seem right. For instance, I've tried the most recent past life one a couple times. In response to the "what is your name" question, I've gotten a different one each time. So what is true? And sometimes when I realize I should be seeing something but I'm not, I feel like I'm trying too hard to come up with something....
As with everything in life this all takes a bit of practice. As with every new skill, getting all frustrated and cross with yourself doesn't help and neither does 'trying too hard'.


How are your basic relaxation skills? It's important to make sure you're relaxed and your mind is clear of worries and distractions before you begin. Like looking into a pool you won't see anything if the surface is all choppy. You need to let the 'waters' settle, then slowly but surely you will be able to see more and more.


Try doing it without the tape for a bit. Take the time to prepare by just quietly breathing for a bit - say 5 minutes or so. Counting down slowly from 50 is a good technique. Imagine a pool of water gradually going still, or some other image that resonates with you. If your mind wanders off you need to start the countdown again from the number you last remembered. Don't get cross with yourself, just bring your attention gently back to counting down the numbers. It is a good focussing technique to practice with. Another good thing to do is to either roll your eyes back to look at your eyebrows, but with your eyelids shut. If this is uncomfortable, just imagine rolling your eyes back. It works. I don't know exactly why, but keeping your eyes still also helps focus your mind somehow and 'looking up' helps you access the kind of 'brainwaves' you want to tune into.


Then when you're in the 'zone' use the material you've already got and focus on that. Take one moment you remember, for instance, riding on the horse, and work with that. What were you doing? Where were you going? How were you feeling? What happened next? We tend to remember important, emotionally charged or otherwise pivotal moments from past lives, just as the present life, so there will be more to discover even from the tiny glimpses you have so far managed to get.


There are some good techniques to experiment with in the below thread. I've had a lot of success with them. Keep trying things like this until you find one that works for you, then practice it from time to time when you're in the mood. It will get easier.


Active Meditation



Don't expect overnight miracles and revelations.


Sometimes it will take me many months to put the pieces together about a single incident. It can take years to work out what happened in a particular life, so start a journal and try not to be impatient with yourself.
 
WOW !. I definitely wouldn't call what you experienced nothing. Far from it. You have far more than I had to begin with. Don't be discouraged, be highly encouraged. Onwards and upwards .


A quick look suggests that Jeswyc (yes-wick) and Jeswycz (yes-wich) are Polish in origin. Looking up the meaning of a name or its etymology can often give an indication to a family or profession to start you on your way.
 
I found the same thing, Dave. The name is Polish, and I did find burial records from Canada that were for people of that name. They were modern burials, but I don't have access to many Canadian records.
 
Maybe it's not Canadian. Poles have been in the U.S. since the Revolutionary War. Even today there are large Polish communities in Ohio and around Chicago. It's also possible these words you got are from more than one past life. The bare feet and deerskin dress may be a different life than the Jeswick name.
 
I couldn't find anyone named Jeswyk, or a variation, in the U.S. records, for any time period. That made me believe that all the Jeswyks in Canada might be descended from one family. In a way, that would make the search a lot easier.
 
BriarRose said:
I couldn't find anyone named Jeswyk, or a variation, in the U.S. records, for any time period. That made me believe that all the Jeswyks in Canada might be descended from one family. In a way, that would make the search a lot easier.
That makes sense.
 
Tanguerra- Thank you for the great advice. I tried your technique of counting backwards from 50, and couldn't make it much past 45 - so evidently, I need a lot more practice. I did get very, very relaxed though and probably would have fallen asleep if my cat hadn't jumped up on me. Tomorrow I'm going to read over the thread you directed me to and try just plain meditation for awhile. It isn't so much that I want the whole picture of everything right away, just that I get so frustrated not being able to visualize. I know I should be able to - I do dream, so the ability must be in there somewhere.


DaveUK, BriarRose, argonne1918 - Thank you all very much for researching this for me, I appreciate it! I am encouraged, and I'm going to keep going, see what else turns up.
 
Pieces to a much larger puzzle ... keep trying and hopefully you will continue to get more information ...


Good luck!
 
Jasiewicz seems to be another, more common variation. Always good to follow all leads. If they're not relevant they soon dry up.


There are multiple listings for the family name Jasiewicz in Canada which seem to cluster around Manitoba, Ontario and Nova Scotia provinces but none seem to go back beyond the 1800's. They all have descendents alive today. The Canadian passenger lists for 1865-1935 also show several Jasiewicz arriving from Poland.
 
That seems to be a good lead. And Manitoba borders North Dakota. Both states are wheat farming regions. The Canadian Pacific Railroad was being built across Canada just north of the border in the late 1800's. Canada is officially bi-lingual, French and English. Most of the French speakers are in Quebec, but they travel all over Canada. 1725 may not be a date. Maybe an address??
 
Interesting! I will have to follow up on that.


I'm thinking that sometimes the dates that pop up aren't really dates, or aren't really accurate. In fact, I've sometimes had "dates" kind of scattered all over the place, so they don't seem relevant.
 
Misty8723 said:
I don't know for sure that the language was French. It wasn't something I intuitively understood the meaning of, and once I realized I was hearing it, it poofed away like everything else. It just sounded like it could be French. I got a sense of Jezwyk, but not sure about spelling, that may just be phonetic. Maybe Cheswyk would make more sense? I don't even know if it was supposed to be first or last name.
Maybe it wasn't French. Maybe Polish? I don't think I've ever heard Polish so I wouldn't know what it sounds like. Maybe I'll look on YouTube.
 
argonne1918 said:
Maybe it wasn't French. Maybe Polish? I don't think I've ever heard Polish so I wouldn't know what it sounds like. Maybe I'll look on YouTube.
I don't know what it was for sure, I didn't understand it, it just had a vaguely French feel to it. I did have an interest in French language when I was younger and took two years of it in high school. I never was good with it, it didn't come naturally, and I figured the reason I was interested was my French ancestry (this life).
 
Argonne, I finally got a chance to listen to that video with Polish, and I still think what I heard sounded more French. I wish there was some way you could get a recording of these PLRs, it's hard to explain things and it's hard to remember all of the details after a while.
 
Back
Top