P.M.H. ATWATER is the author of a book titled "Children of The New Millenium." Below is her website for an article on light and an excerpt from that reading. Several posts talk about "enlightenment" - what it is and isn't. I am most interested in studies and observations of LIGHT.
I would love to hear comments and reflections regarding the term enlightenment and/or experiences that you can relate to the above quote.
"........Of intrigue are these observations I was able to make about the effect of the three very different types of subjective light:
1). Primary Light fostered exceptionally deep mystical knowings in people afterward and seemed to engender more radical changes in their sense of reality and life's purpose than with others.
2). Dark Light gently reassured those it touched and left them with a sense of being nurtured and supported while at the same time linked to larger evolutionary processes. Those who reported
3). Bright Light, though, displayed a broad range of visibly heightened abilities and an unusual sensitivity to sound, sunshine, pharmaceuticals, and anything electrically based.
In reference to the "electrical sensitivity" component, I was able to show with a questionnaire I used in the book "BEYOND THE LIGHT" that the presence of electrical sensitivity can be traced, not to the experiencer's length of exposure to the brightness subjective light can produce, but specifically to the intensity of that experience. In other words, it didn't seem to matter how much light filled an individual's scenario or what type, or whether he or she merged with that light. What mattered was how Powerfully and deeply it was felt, even if for but a brief period of time.
Curiously, if either adult or child experiencer challenged the angels, God, or religious-type figures that appeared during his or her scenario, asking "Is that what you really look like," to a person, the image would dissolve into light or suddenly burst into a massive sun-like sphere.
But, again, irrespective of image or imagery, initial feelings or sensations, are what mattered most, what made the biggest difference afterwards was the intensity of what was experienced. And, the spread of aftereffects, all of them, can be traced to the impact of that intensity.
The aftereffects, as profiled in "BEYOND THE LIGHT," suggest that near-death states can engender what may well be a brain shift - a structural, chemical, and functionary change in the brain. I examined this possibility in the research report, "Brain Shift/Spirit Shift: A Theoretical Model Using Research on Near-Death States to Explore the Transformation of Consciousness" (available from me personally or via my website at www.cinemind.com/atwater[5]). Be the numerous connections that can be made between the aftereffects and the intensity of what occurs in near death episodes, and what that seems to imply, I have come to regard the impact felt from such an experience as far more significant than who or what an individual meets on The Other Side of Death's Curtain.
It seems to me, based on my research, that a sudden charge of energy or voltage current must be present. Such a "charge" mimics lightning in the way and manner of its manifestation. The rendering that follows compares "lightflashes" in the natural world with those that seem to occur when consciousness transforms:
* In the evolution of the natural world, to equalize pressure differences between clouds in a thunderstorm and polarity of soil in the ground, descending bolts of electricity
(from the clouds) and ascending bolts of electricity (from the earth) meet to create a huge lightflash (external explosion/lightning), which stabilizes environmental integrity
while stimulating plant growth through the creation of nitrogen compounds.
* In the evolution of human consciousness, to equalize pressure differences between latent spiritual potentiality and mundane personality development, descending currents of force (possibly from the soul level, Higher Self,God) and ascending
currents of force (perhaps from time/space ego states, lower self, personality level) meet to create a powerful lightflash (internal implosion/illumination), which stabilizes and balances individual bodymind integrity while stimulating human growth through the expansion and enhancement of consciousness.
Think about what this might mean. Whether external to us or internally, either an explosion or implosion of light occurs if opposing forms energy suddenly converge. This releases pressure or radiation to such a degree that some form of nourishment or growth results. Enlightenment by its very definition means an experience of light that imparts knowledge and information for the expansion of human consciousness and the evolution of the human family.
What makes us think that this experience is only symbolic? Or merely a shift of attitudes? Or a product of wishful thinking?
The Aramaic word NOOHRA means "light," "enlightenment," and "under standing." Noohra or "light" in many passages of the Christian Bible re- fers to God, His Word, or a true teaching. But it also connotes "innate knowledge," as if the Old Testament prophets understood that the world of matter was endowed from its very beginnings with the power of inner light.
(a good reference for this is the book, "LET THERE BE LIGHT: THE SEVEN KEYS," by Rocco A. Errico, D.D. [6]).
I would love to hear comments and reflections regarding the term enlightenment and/or experiences that you can relate to the above quote.